It recently proposed a "refined" version of the Internet Kill Switch Bill.
This time opting to refer to the move as "internet freedom".
There exists no limits to their double speak.
If tighter restrictions = freedom, its only to those who inflict the constraints.
The bill still bequeaths the ability for those who declare an emergency to terminate websites
they deem as risky to national security, but the guidelines for passing such judgment
and criteria at which to judge are vague at best.
In other internet news:
the Department of Homeland Security mistakingly seized 84,000 websites
replacing said domains with a warning accusing them of trafficking child pornography.
Can you say: defamation of character?
This time opting to refer to the move as "internet freedom".
There exists no limits to their double speak.
If tighter restrictions = freedom, its only to those who inflict the constraints.
The bill still bequeaths the ability for those who declare an emergency to terminate websites
they deem as risky to national security, but the guidelines for passing such judgment
and criteria at which to judge are vague at best.
In other internet news:
the Department of Homeland Security mistakingly seized 84,000 websites
replacing said domains with a warning accusing them of trafficking child pornography.
Can you say: defamation of character?
No comments:
Post a Comment